- The predominant regulatory regime for ANS is economic regulation, but non-SES States continue to use the full cost-recovery approach. Most ANSPs are fully State-owned. Only ENAV and NATS have a mix of public and private ownership.
- ANSPs subject to economic regulation were able to maintain their cost-base fairly stable between 2012 and 2019. However, some of them exhibited substantial capacity issues especially in 2018 and 2019. This indicates the need to find a better balance between cost-effectiveness and capacity performance.
- ATCO productivity for the full cost-recovery and State bodies ANSPs were typically below the European average (except in 2022). Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) were consistently above average and showed a less severe drop during the pandemic. This result potentially indicates differing levels of flexibility in response to crisis situations.
- Between 2012 and 2022, full cost-recovery ANSPs had the highest number of support staff per unit of output. ANSPs under economic regulation were quite close, with PPPs consistently showing the lowest number of unit support staff over the period.
- Terminal ANS provision in some States has been liberalised, allowing for greater competition in this segment. For instance, in the UK, Spain, and Sweden the market shares of the non-incumbent ANSPs respectively represented 39%, 25% and 14% in 2022.
- Although interesting findings emerged at aggregated level when considering different regulation regimes or legal statuses, there is no clear and straightforward relationships between individual ANSPs performance and the regulatory regime / legal status.
Download the full report below to find out more.