This data is published by the Performance Review Body (PRB) of the Single European Sky. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and analysis contained on this website are as accurate and complete as possible. Despite these precautions, should you find any errors or inconsistencies we would be grateful if you could please bring them to the Performance Review Unit’s attention. For feedback or questions please contact us at: Performance Review Unit Note that the dashboard takes a few moments to fully load |
First Reference Period (RP1): | |||
EU wide view | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |
Local View | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |
Airport View | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |
Support: | ||||
Download Area | Meta data | Glossary | ||
Dashboard second reference period (RP2) |
TRAFFIC [full year]
|
|
IFR flights
|
|
Source: Network Manager
|
Avg. daily IFR flights (table is sortable)
[Download table]
|
SAFETY [full year]
|
|
Separation Minima Infringements (SMI)
Source: DPS/SSR (final results, September 2013)
|
Runway incursions (RI)
Source: DPS/SSR (final results, September 2013)
|
ATM Specific Technical Events (ATM)
Source: DPS/SSR (final results, September 2013)
|
Reporting of Just Culture
(Meta data)
There are no results at European wide level. The results at State and ANSP level can be found at:
Note that the total number of "NO" answers may not reflect an absence of Just Culture. |
The results at ANSP level can be found at: EoSM 2012 Source: EASA |
RAT methodology application
(Meta data)
EU-wide average percentage of Separation Minima Infringements (SMI), Runway incursions (RI), and ATM Specific Technical Events (ATM) for which severity was assessed with RAT methodology. The results at State level can be found at: RAT application 2012 Note: Some States did not report on the application of RAT methodology. Those States were credited with 0%. In addition, there are a few cases when no occurrences of specific type have been reported. These were not included in the average.Source: DPS/SSR (final results, September 2013) |
CAPACITY
|
|
En route ATFM delay KPI
(Meta data)
|
|
En-route ATFM delay (PP. vs. actual) (Jan.-Dec. 2012)
[Download data] |
|
En route ATFM delay (actual versus performance plan)
Source: Network Manager
|
|
Source: Network Manager
|
Airport arrival ATFM delay by airport
[Download table]
|
26 of 39 airports presently included in European view
Source: PRU analysis; CODA; Network Manager
|
ASMA additional time by airport
[Download table]
|
44 of 77 airports presently included in European view
Source: PRU analysis; CODA; Network Manager
|
Taxi-out additional time by airport
[Download table]
|
ENVIRONMENT
|
|
Source: Network Manager
|
|
Booking and release procedures
[Download table]
Source: NSAs
|
Utilisation of Conditional Routes (CDRs)
Source: Network Manager
|
COST-EFFICIENCY
|
|
En-route Service Units (SU)[actual vs. National/FAB Perf. Plan (NPP)]
|
|
En-route Service Units (PP. vs. actual) (Jan.-Dec. 2012) [Download data] |
|
Source:CRCO; National/FAB performance plans (NPP)
|
|
Source:CRCO; National/FAB performance plans (NPP)
|
|
En route (ER) cost efficiency (annual, real terms, €2009)
Source:CRCO; National/FAB performance plans (NPP)
|
|
Source:National/FAB performance plans (NPP)
|
Source:National/FAB performance plans (NPP)
|
The information may be copied in whole or in part providing that the copyright notice and disclaimer are included. The information may not be modified without prior written permission from the PRB.
The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of EUROCONTROL or of the European Commission, which make no warranty, either implied or express, for the information
contained on this website, neither do they assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this information. The PRB reserves the right to change or amend
the information provided at any time and without prior notice.
|