Reporting Period 2 - 2018 dashboard

 Traffic
  Average daily IFR flights
Period: January-December
Source: Network Manager

 SAFETY


  Safety KPI #1: Effectiveness of safety management (EoSM)
Period: January-December
Source: EASA
FAB level

State level

ANSP level

 RAT methodology application   (Meta data)
 Reporting of Just Culture    (Meta data)
Period: January - December
Source: DPS/SSR
Period: January - December
Source: EASA

There are no just culture results at European wide level.
The 2018 results at State and ANSP level can be found in the download file

 Note that the total number of “NO” answers may not reflect an absence of Just Culture.

  ENVIRONMENT
 Environment KPI #1: Horizontal en-route flight efficiency [%]
Period: January-December
Source: PRU analysis; Network Manager

  Environment PI #1: Additional taxi-out time [minutes per departure]
Period: January-December
Source: PRU analysis; Airports

  Environment PI #2: Additional time in terminal airspace [minutes per arrival]
Period: January-December
Source: PRU analysis; Airports; Network Manager


 CAPACITY
These data take into account post-operations adjustments made to date. The data may be subject to further revision when the process is finalised. For more information see also the Post Operations Adjustment Process web page.
  Capacity KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per flight [minutes per flight]
Note: The data may be subject to further revision when the post operations adjustment process is finalised.
Period: January-December
Source: Network Manager

  Capacity KPI #2: Airport ATFM arrival delay per flight [min./arr.]
Note: The data may be subject to further revision when the post operations adjustment process is finalised.
Period: January-December
Source: PRU analysis; Network Manager





  Capacity PI #1: Adherence to ATFM slots [% flights inside the slot tolerance window of [-5, +10 min.]]
Period: January-December
Source: Network Manager

  Capacity PI #2: Air traffic control pre-departure delay [min. per dep.]
Period: January-November
Source: Airports

 COST-EFFICIENCY
  En-route Service Units (TSU)[actual vs. determined]
Period: January-December
Source: CRCO; EC; PRU analysis
 En-route TSU: by charging zones (2017)

 En-route TSU: actual vs. determined (2017)

  Cost efficiency KPI #1: Determined unit cost (DUC) for en-route (ER) ANS
Period: January-December 2018
Source: States, CRCO
The figures shown below are expressed in real term (Euro 2009). The underlying data (currencies, etc.) are available in the download file. (D)=Determined ; (A)=Actual





  Cost efficiency KPI #2: Determined unit cost (DUC) for terminal (TR) ANS
As of 2017, two terminal charging zones (TCZ) were established in France (TCZ1 Paris airports and TCZ2 Other airports) and Poland (TCZ1 Warsaw airport and TCZ2 Other airports) instead of one single TCZs comprising 60 airports in France and 15 airports in Poland in 2016.
Period: January-December 2018
Source: States, CRCO
The figures shown below are expressed in real term (Euro 2009). The underlying data (currencies, etc.) are available in the download file. (D)=Determined ; (A)=Actual