The data and indicators for reference period 2 are in accordance with Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013.
|
Traffic
|
|
Average daily IFR flights
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: Network Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAFETY
|
|
Safety KPI #1: Effectiveness of safety management (EoSM)
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: EASA
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAB level
|
State level
|
ANSP level
|
|
|
|
|
Period: January - December
|
|
Source: DPS/SSR
|
Period: January - December
|
|
Source: EASA
|
|
|
There are no just culture results at European wide level.
The 2018 results at State and ANSP level can be found in the download file
Note that the total number of “NO” answers may not reflect an absence of Just Culture.
|
|
ENVIRONMENT
|
|
Environment KPI #1: Horizontal en-route flight efficiency [%]
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: PRU analysis; Network Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment PI #1: Additional taxi-out time [minutes per departure]
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: PRU analysis; Airports
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment PI #2: Additional time in terminal airspace [minutes per arrival]
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: PRU analysis; Airports; Network Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPACITY
These data take into account post-operations adjustments (Status 29 April 2019).
For more information see also the Post Operations Adjustment Process web page.
|
|
Capacity KPI #1: En-route ATFM delay per flight [minutes per flight]
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: Network Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity KPI #2: Airport ATFM arrival delay per flight [min./arr.]
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: PRU analysis; Network Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity PI #1: Adherence to ATFM slots [% flights inside the slot tolerance window of [-5, +10 min.]]
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: Network Manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity PI #2: Air traffic control pre-departure delay [min. per dep.]
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: Airports
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST-EFFICIENCY
|
|
En-route Service Units (TSU)[actual vs. determined]
|
|
Period: January-December
|
|
Source: CRCO; EC; PRU analysis
|
|
|
En-route TSU: by charging zones (2017)
|
En-route TSU: actual vs. determined (2017)
|
|
Cost efficiency KPI #1: Determined unit cost (DUC) for en-route (ER) ANS
|
|
Period: January-December 2018
|
|
Source: States, CRCO
|
|
|
The figures shown below are expressed in real term (Euro 2009). The underlying data (currencies, etc.) are available in the download file.
(D)=Determined ; (A)=Actual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost efficiency KPI #2: Determined unit cost (DUC) for terminal (TR) ANS
As of 2017, two terminal charging zones (TCZ) were established in France (TCZ1 Paris airports and TCZ2 Other airports) and Poland (TCZ1 Warsaw airport and TCZ2 Other airports) instead of one single TCZs comprising 60 airports in France and 15 airports in Poland in 2016.
|
|
Period: January-December 2018
|
|
Source: States, CRCO
|
|
|
The figures shown below are expressed in real term (Euro 2009). The underlying data (currencies, etc.) are available in the download file.
(D)=Determined ; (A)=Actual
|
|
|
|
|
|