Continuous climb and descent operations

Towards a flexible, optimum flight path that delivers major environmental and economic benefits.

Status of Task Force work flows following TF#9 meeting (June 2020)

TF#9 took place virtually on the 24th June 2020. The high level conclusions are detailed below:

  • The European CCO / CDO Action Plan has been approved by RNDSG / NETOPS and is currently undergoing a graphic design process to make the document more appealing (similar to the EAPPRI report).
  • The draft CCO / CDO Performance dashboard was reviewed, comments requested and will be updated in accordance with comments received.
  • The draft webpages of the new CCO / CDO Tool Kit were shared.
  • The Action Plan, updated Performance dashboard and Tool Kit will be released to TF members shortly with an official release later in the year at the appropriate time / meeting.
  • The ATCO refresher training is online and available at the IANS Training Zone.
  • A draft structure and content has been developed for the Pilot CBT on CCO / CDO. Volunteers are required from TF ATCO and Pilot members for providing inputs and reviewing the proposed content.
  • Eduardo (CANSO) presented an overview of the IATA / CANSO initiative to deliver additional environmental benefits during the traffic downturn.
  • Fran (EUROCONTROL) reported on optimum flight profiles in practice during the traffic turndown.

Task Force future plans:

  • The current TF mandate finishes at the end of 2020 – the decision on the TF future will take place at NETOPS/28 (October).
  • Ideas for future TF work will be requested by email and then discussed on a webex. Any proposals will be proposed to RNDSG / NETOPS.
  • These discussions will be used to feed inputs into the NETOPS/28 meeting which will take place on the 12-13 October 2020.
  • Following NETOPS/28, TF#10 (planned for 10-11th November) will share the outcomes of NETOPS/28, discuss future proposals and continue with current work streams. These include:
    • Address outstanding actions and work flows;
    • Complete filming for pilot training;
    • IATA / TF to work on a proposal for an ‘IATA recommendation to train flight crew on CDO’;
    • Monitor performance dashboard and support stakeholder performance;
    • Provider stakeholder implementation support and get case studies;
    • High-level review of European AIPs to note any mention of non-implementation of ICAO Amendment 7A relating to SID / STAR phraseology;
    • Development of a set of generic slides about TF actions;
    • Liaise with CFSPs at next NM / CFSPs group meeting – how can flight planning contribute to enhanced VFE;
    • Communications – CANSO, A4E, efficiency seminar, TF to host workshop with IATA on TF outcomes;
    • More analysis with Airbus / Boeing on e.g. CCO vs CDO, level segment vs track extension;
    • Support NM with the addition of CCO / CDO to the NM operational excellence programme; and,
    • Propose and develop new ideas for discussion e.g. complementary metrics, AI for CDO etc.

Continuous Climb and Descent Operations (CCOs and CDOs) are aircraft operating techniques enabled by airspace design, instrument procedure design and facilitated by air traffic control (ATC). CCO and CDO allow aircraft to follow a flexible, optimum flight path that delivers major environmental and economic benefits - reduced fuel burn, gaseous emissions, noise and fuel costs - without any adverse effect on safety.

CCO and CDO operations allow arriving or departing aircraft to descend or climb continuously, to the greatest extent possible. Aircraft applying CCO employ optimum climb engine thrust and climb speeds until reaching their cruising levels. With CDO, aircraft employ minimum engine thrust, ideally from top of descent and in a low drag configuration, prior to the final approach fix. Employment of these techniques reduces intermediate level-offs and results in time being spent at more fuel-efficient higher cruising levels, hence significantly reducing fuel burn and lowering emissions and fuel costs (see ICAO Doc 9993 and ICAO Doc 9931).

340,000 tons

fuel savings (1 million+ tonnes CO2)

+ € 150 M.


1-5 dB

noise reduction

Implementation support

We, at EUROCONTROL, support CCO and CDO deployment. A dedicated team works with stakeholders (ANSPs, aircraft manufacturers and aviation industry associations such as IATA, A4E, AIRE, EBAA, ERA, ACI and CANSO) to measure and maximise the benefits achievable in the current ATM framework. The team also supports the facilitation of a more advanced CCO and CDO concept that will result from deploying future ATM tools and procedures. A guide to implementing continuous descent is available. 


Deployment of optimised CCO and CDO throughout Europe will be beneficial to all European ATM system stakeholders and will help the network to address the environmental challenges it faces.

In 2018, EUROCONTROL conducted an ECAC-wide CCO and CDO analysis using 2017 traffic data, in order to estimate the potential network benefits of optimising the CCO and CDO in terms of fuel savings, emissions reduction and fuel costs.

 For CCO, the study concluded that 94% of flights in ECAC currently fly CCO to FL (Flight Level) 100 while 74% fly a full CCO to Top of Climb (ToC).

 For those flights currently flying non-CCO profiles, the average time in level flight to the ToC was 168 seconds with per-flight savings estimated at 15kg fuel/48kg CO2/7EUR. Across the network, this would result in a potential average per-departure saving of 4.3kg fuel/13.7kg CO2/~2€

 For CDO, the study concluded that 41% of flights fly CDO from FL75 (the top of the noise CDO) while only 24% fly a CDO from Top of Descent (ToD – the top of the fuel CDO). 

For those flights currently flying non-CDO profiles, the average time in level flight from the ToD was 217 seconds, with per-flight savings estimated at 46kg fuel/145kg CO2/20EUR. Across the network, this would result in a potential average per-arrival saving of 35kg fuel/110kg CO2/15€.

 The ECAC-wide study identified two main conclusions:

  • The results indicate that in Europe the potential savings from optimising CCO and CDO are up to 340,000 tonnes fuel/year, (1.1M tonnes CO2/150M EUR) *; 
  • The potential fuel saving benefits from CDO are in the region of x10 those from CCO.

(*) It should be noted that the achievement of 100% CCO and CDO across the European network may not be possible for a number of reasons, such as safety (i.e. the need to keep aircraft separated by a certain distance or time), weather, capacity or ATCO workload, all of which may be considered as interdependencies, while small inefficiencies in the system are required to operate a flexible and operationally efficient network.

What are Continuous Climb and Descent Operations (CCO and CDO)?

What can air travel industry do to reduce noise pollution?

The European CCO and CDO Task Force

Historically in Europe, the implementation of CCO and CDO operations has been encouraged on an ‘as-much-as-you-can’ basis while, until recently, there has been no harmonised definition of what actually constitutes a CCO or CDO operation.

In addition, there has been no assessment of the potential network-wide benefits that could be realised by optimal CCO and CDO operations.

In 2015, a task force of European ATM stakeholders was created with the objective of agreeing harmonised definitions, metrics and parameters to measure CCO and CDO operations in Europe. The resulting harmonised definitions, metrics and parameters agreed by the Task Force are recommended to be used by any European ATM stakeholder for the measurement of CCO, CDO or vertical flight efficiency performance in order to enable harmonisation at international level.

The work of the Task Force is ongoing and is expected to be completed by 2019 with the delivery of an updated CDO Action Plan document and a “State of Play’ document on CCO/CDO. More information will be detailed on the website once it becomes available.